Wednesday, September 08, 2010Register
Home   |  
About   |  
Contact   |  
Mailing List   |  
Search

Federal Policies & Incentives

This page provides an overview of specific federal actions that have impacted clean energy over the years. For general polcy issues currently confronting clean energy adoption, visit the main Policies & Incentives page.

For current federal legislation being considered with respect to clean energy, refer to the following resources:


Landmark laws that continue to impact clean energy adoption include the following:

Clean Air Act of 1970

The federal Clean Air Act of 1970 and its amendments, especially the 1990 Amendments, are the basis of most air pollution policy and regulation in the United States. The Clean Air Act is the comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from area, stationary, and mobile sources. One of the most important components of this law is the requirement for EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and the environment. The NAAQS, as promulgated by the EPA from time to time, form the foundation of the U.S. air quality program. The NAAQS set standards for 6 "criteria pollutants" of which NOX (a precursor to ground-level ozone or smog), CO, SO2 and PM are of the greatest relevance to distributed generation/CHP.

The NAAQS goals of health-based standards for the quality of ambient air are designed to ensure that the air everywhere in the U.S. is fit to breathe. Locations throughout the country are classified as either "in attainment" or "nonattainment" for a given pollutant.

Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments requires all major sources and some minor sources of air pollution to obtain an operating permit. See Regulation section (Air Quality subsection) below for more information.


Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act of 1978

Enacted in 1978, PURPA was intended to encourage more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly commercial energy production. PURPA defined a new class of energy producer called a qualifying facility (QF). QFs are either small-scale producers of commercial energy who normally self-generate energy for their own needs but may have occasional or frequent surplus energy, or incidental producers who happen to generate usable electric energy as a byproduct of other activities. When a facility of this type meets the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's requirements for ownership, size and efficiency, utility companies are obliged to purchase energy from these facilities based on a pricing structure referred to as avoided cost rates. These rates tend to be highly favorable to the producer, and are intended to encourage more production of this type of energy as a means of reducing emissions and dependence on other sources of energy.

Current status:

  • FERC terminated the requirement that an electric utility enter into a new contract or obligation to purchase electric energy from qualifying cogeneration or small power production (SPP) facilities provided the Commission finds that the qualifying facility has nondiscriminatory access to one of three categories of markets as defined in Section 210(m)(1)(A),(B), or (C) of PURPA. (Issued October 20, 2006)
  • FERC eliminated the statutory prohibition against public utility ownership of more than 50% of qualifying facilities. (Order No. 671)

 

Energy Policy Act of 2005

After nearly 13 years since the enactment of the original Energy Polict Act (EPAct), 2005's successor included provisions impacting clean energy. The primary driver for EPAct 2005's passage was to ensure domestic energy supplies to guard against flucutant global oil prices. Key clean energy features included:

  • Grants awarded for construction or renovation of public buildings using 30% less energy than comparable buildings
  • Grants for low-income community energy efficiency projects (§126)
  • Promotes district heating and cooling programs (§206(b))
  • Tax credit for energy systems that reduce demand (§1331)

Related resouces:

 

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

Due to their transformative benefits including efficiencies, cost savings, and emissions reductions, clean energy projects qualified for a number of competitive and block grants that were funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and administered largely by state and local entities. The $3.2 billion Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Program was the primary vehicle through which projects were funded, sometimes over multiple rounds.

Related resources:

 

Executive orders

While not considered legislation, executive orders are occasionally issued by U.S. presidents and have legislative-like effects on the operations of the federal government. Recent executive orders related to agencies' energy and environmental policies and, by extension, the clean energy industry include:

  • E.O. 13514 - Signed in October 2009, EO 13514 requires federal agencies to set specific greenhouse gas reduction targets by 2020 and other sustainability goals such as:
    • 26% improvement in water efficiency by 2020;
    • 95% of all applicable contracts will meet sustainability requirements; and
    • Implementation of a 2030 net-zero-energy building requirement.
  • E.O. 13423 - Signed by President Bush in January 2007, EO 13423 ("Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management") instructs federal agencies to conduct environmental, transportation, and energy-related activities in an efficient, sustainable manner.

  • E.O. 13123 - Signed by President Clinton in June 1999, EO 13123 ("Greening the Government through Energy-Efficient Management") instructs federal agencies to reduce GHG emissions and achieve certain energy-efficiency goals by 2010.

One of the key uncertainties in developing CHP is the requirement for a variety of permits and approvals. These requirements cover a wide variety of topics and vary widely by state, fuel type, and project size. These regulatory hurdles can strongly impact a project's end result by either forcing a developer to abandon the project entirely or delaying the implementation process so that the developer loses valuable time and money. The two major classes of regulations affecting clean energy are interconnection and air quality.

  

Interconnection

(For discussion and resources on interconnection issues for distributed generation, see the Policies & Incentives main page.)

FERC Actions

    1. Ensures that new qualifying cogeneration facilities are using their thermal output in a productive and beneficial manner; that the electrical, thermal, chemical and mechanical output of new qualifying cogeneration facilities is used fundamentally for industrial, commercial, residential or institutional purposes; and that there is continuing progress in the development of efficient electric energy generating technology;
    2. Amends Form 556 to reflect the criteria for new qualifying cogeneration facilities;
    3. Eliminates ownership limitations for qualifying cogeneration and small power production facilities and
    4. Amends the exemptions available to qualifying facilities from the requirements of Federal Power Act and the Public Utility Holding Company Act.
Air Quality

(For other resources on air quality issues for distributed generation, see the Emissions page and Policies & Incentives main page.)

Permitting overview

Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments requires all major sources and some minor sources of air pollution to obtain an operating permit. Deploying CHP technologies in non-attainment areas can be significantly harder due to stricter air quality permitting rules on certain equipment such as large engines. Currently, emissions limits are input-based, that is, they have been established on a unit of pollutant emitted per unit of fuel input (lb/MMBtu) basis. This approach relies on the application of pollution control devices to reduce emissions and does not explicitly recognize the efficiency of the process in converting fuel input into a useful output. As such, input-based regulations do not encourage pollution reductions through energy efficiency. If, instead, emissions limits were calculated on an output basis the inherent efficiencies of combined heat and power technologies would be properly accounted.

New source review process

To meet National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) goals, the Clean Air Act requires pre-construction environmental permitting of new stationary facilities in all parts of the U.S. that emit criteria pollutants. The new source permitting program, generically known as new source review (NSR), sets emission control requirements for the criteria pollutants for new and modified facilities. Technically the new source permitting program comprises the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) and the nonattainment new source review programs however, the entire program is generically referred to as NSR. The permitting process determines what pollution controls will be required. The permitting process is administered by states, which leads to a high degree of variability in its implementation.

Where environmental permitting problems exist for new CHP/DG projects, NSR is the most likely concern. The manner in which the NSR permitting process applies to a proposed project is determined by the "potential emissions" of the affected source. Potential emissions means the total annual emissions if the source were to run at full capacity for an entire year. New or modified sources that exceed certain potential emissions thresholds are called "
major sources" and are subject to the federal NSR program. If emissions are below the major source threshold, sources are subject to "minor source review". Finally, there is usually an emission or size threshold below which sources are exempt from environmental permitting. To learn more about the emissions standards in Gulf Coast states, see our states information pages.

Title V

Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments requires all major sources and some minor sources of air pollution to obtain an operating permit. A Title V permit grants a source permission to operate. The permit includes all air pollution requirements that apply to the source, including emissions limits and monitoring, record keeping, and reporting requirements.

EPA State Implementation Plan (SIP) Guidance for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Measures
In August 2004, EPA released an air quality guidance document that describes how states and localities can estimate emission reductions from energy efficiency and renewable energy measures and include them in State Implementation Plans (SIPs).

The guidance document includes: A basic four-step process to quantify SIP credits; discussion of important factors that need to be considered (for example, cap-and-trade programs and future control requirements); references, information, databases and tools to help quantify emission reductions; and two real-world examples of measures proposed for SIP credit.

The guidance covers electric-sector projects, initiatives, or measures that result in quantifiable emission reductions at fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units and improve air quality in non-attainment areas. Example measures include: programs that replace existing electrical devices with more efficient ones; projects that save energy through design, construction, or reconstruction; and programs that increase the generation of electricity from renewable resources, such as CHP.
 

Output-Based Regulations (OBR)

The NAAQS goals of health-based standards for the quality of ambient air are designed to ensure that the air everywhere in the U.S. is fit to breathe. Locations throughout the country are classified as either "in attainment" or "nonattainment" for a given pollutant. Find out if your location's status here.

Deploying CHP technologies in nonattainment areas can be significantly harder due to stricter air quality permitting rules on certain equipment such as large engines. Currently, emissions limits are input-based, that is, they have been established on a unit of pollutant emitted per unit of fuel input (lb/MMBtu) basis. This approach relies on the application of pollution control devices to reduce emissions and does not explicitly recognize the efficiency of the process in converting fuel input into a useful output. As such, input-based regulations do not encourage pollution reductions through energy efficiency.

The goal of output-based regulations (OBR) is to encourage the use of fuel conversion efficiency and renewable energy as air pollution control measures. OBR level the playing field by establishing performance criteria and allowing efficiency and renewable energy to compete on equal footing with any other method of reducing emissions, such as combustion controls and add-on controls.

Comparing different energy generation facilities is easy and clear when they are permitted on an output-basis, as demonstrated below. The input-based emissions limits stated on the left provide a limited indication of the actual emissions impact of the plants, while the limits on the right directly correlate to the actual emissions impact of the plants.

Plant Emissions Comparison
Source: U.S. EPA CHP Partnership website

 

Additional resources:

For current information on federal incentives, consult the following resources:


Examples of federal incentives include the following:

  • 1.8¢/kWh for Advanced Turbines, Fuel Cells, Hybrids, or Energy Storage - Under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Section 1224) owners or operators of advanced power system technologies are eligible for a payment of 1.8 cents per kWh of electricity generation. Qualifying facilities must use an advanced turbine, fuel cell, or hybrid power system or a power storage system to generate or store electricity. Facilities are eligible up to the first 10 million kWh produced in a fiscal year. An additional 0.7 cents per kWh is available for owners or operators of qualifying security and assured power facilities as deemed appropriate by DOE and Department of Homeland Security. Expires December 31, 2012.
  • Energy Efficient Commercial & Public Buildings Tax Deduction - Commercial and public buildings that install energy efficient technologies including CHP are eligible for a tax deduction of $0.30-$1.80 per square foot. For details see the Commercial Buildings Tax Deduction Coalition.
  • Renewable Energy Production Incentive (for Governments, Municipal Utilities, & Rural Co-ops) - State and local governments, tribal governments, municipal utilities, and rural cooperatives can receive a tax credit of $1.8¢/kWh (adjusted for inflation) for CHP technologies fueled by biomass, livestock methane, or landfill gas, for 10 years of operation.
  • USDA Renewable Energy Systems and Energy Efficiency Improvements - Grants & Loans (Farm Bill) - Agricultural projects or commercial projects in rural areas can get grants of up to 25% of project costs, with a maximum of $500,000, or loans of up to 50% of project costs with a maximum of $10 million. Natural gas-fired CHP systems may qualify as an energy efficiency measure, and obviously biomass or other renewable-fueled CHP systems will certainly qualify as a renewable energy system.
  • Inventions and Innovations Program - The Inventions and Innovations Program offers grants to individuals and small businesses for the investigation of innovative ideas and inventions with commercial market potential that could save a significant amount of energy. Once or twice a year, the program releases an "announcement of funding opportunity."
  • StEPP Foundation - The StEPP Foundation, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, has funding available for energy efficiency, renewable energy, and pollution prevention projects implemented for the benefit of the public. For more information, go to www.steppfoundation.org.
  • Grants for Projects in Economically-Distressed Areas - The Economic Development Administration's (EDA's) Public Works Program helps communities in economic decline revitalize, expand, and upgrade their facilities. Projects that have been funded in the past include: water and sewer facilities upgrades; technology-related infrastructure development; diversification of natural resource dependent economies efforts; commercialization and deployment of innovative technologies; business/industrial development; and the demolition, renovation, and construction of publicly owned facilities. The following types of applicants are eligible for funding: economic development districts; states, cities, or other political subdivisions of a state or consortium of political subdivisions; Indian tribes; colleges and universities; public or private nonprofit organizations; and associations acting in cooperation with officials of a political subdivision of a state. Projects must either be located in or directly benefit an area that exhibits economic distress, determined based on the level of unemployment, per capita income, or special need. EDA provides direct grants, on a cost-share basis, generally funding 50 percent of the project cost.

 


Houston Advanced Research CenterU.S. Department of Energy Gulf Coast Clean Energy Application Center
4800 Research Forest Drive
The Woodlands, TX 77381

Privacy StatementTerms Of UseHouston Advanced Research Center

BorderBoxedBlueBoxedGrayBlueSmall width layoutMedium width layoutMaximum width layoutMaximum textMedium textSmall textBack Top!